{"id":979,"date":"2013-05-01T08:18:11","date_gmt":"2013-05-01T08:18:11","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/antimuseum.com\/?p=979"},"modified":"2023-06-06T14:29:45","modified_gmt":"2023-06-06T12:29:45","slug":"3-ways-of-seeing-the-paris-metro-vote-for-your-preferred-picture","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/antimuseum.com\/en\/2013\/05\/01\/3-ways-of-seeing-the-paris-metro-vote-for-your-preferred-picture\/","title":{"rendered":"3 ways of seeing the Paris metro: vote for your preferred picture"},"content":{"rendered":"

When I “developed” that picture with my favourite piece of software (Adobe Lightroom 4<\/a>), I hesitated a lot as to which kind of rendition I’d choose. At first, I really liked the original picture below.<\/p>\n

\"metro<\/a>
\nRendition 1 (above) is therefore untouched. Except for straightening vertical lines very distorted by my wide angle lens.
\n\"metro<\/a>
\n(Rendition 2: above) Then I tried to work on a copy of that picture using the “colourfade” preset (download link below text). It sorts of enables you to turn your picture into a black & white still + 1 (or 2) tones. Here I tweaked the preset in order to add the blue sky. I thought looked great because it then highlighted black figures against a blue sky and at the same time, there was these special grey tones in the corners.
\n\"metro<\/a>
\nRendition 3 (above) was even more radical, and I assumed that what mattered was the Chinese shadow-type characters in the picture and the blue sky was only there to distract the eye of the reader.<\/p>\n

Now is a good time to decide which picture you prefer and vote:<\/p>\n<\/a>

<\/div>
<\/div>